Skip to main content

What is the Human Review Block?

The Human Review block pauses workflow execution and waits for human input before continuing. Use it when automated decisions need human oversight, approval, or manual data entry. Common use cases:
  • Content approval before publishing
  • Quality control checkpoints
  • Manual data verification
  • Editorial review of AI-generated content
  • Decision-making that requires human judgment
  • Compliance and legal reviews

How Does the Human Review Block Work?

The Human Review block works in three stages:

1. Workflow Pause

When execution reaches the Human Review block, the workflow pauses and sends a notification to designated reviewers.

2. Human Input

Reviewers see the content and provide input based on the format you configured:
  • Text: Free-form text response
  • Single Selection: Choose one option from a list
  • Multi Selection: Choose multiple options from a list

3. Workflow Resume

After the reviewer submits their response, the workflow automatically resumes and continues to the next step. The review response becomes available as output data.

Configuration

Review Content

You can add multiple review items to a single Human Review block. Each review item has its own configuration.

Title (Required)

The title displayed to the reviewer. Example:
Review Blog Post Content
Tips:
  • Use clear, descriptive titles
  • Indicate what action is needed
  • Keep it concise (under 10 words)

Instructions (Optional)

Detailed instructions explaining what the reviewer should do. Example:
Please review the generated blog post for:
- Factual accuracy
- Brand voice consistency
- Grammar and spelling
- SEO optimization

Approve if ready to publish, or provide revision notes.
Tips:
  • Be specific about what to review
  • Include evaluation criteria
  • Mention what happens after approval/rejection
  • Add context if needed

Format

Choose how the reviewer will respond. Options: Text (Default) Free-form text input. Reviewer can type any response. Use when:
  • Collecting detailed feedback
  • Revision notes needed
  • Open-ended questions
  • Editorial comments
Single Selection Reviewer chooses one option from a predefined list. Use when:
  • Approval/rejection decisions
  • Choosing between alternatives
  • Status updates
  • Simple yes/no questions
Note: When using Single Selection, the “Value to Review” must be a list (array) of options. Multi Selection Reviewer can choose multiple options from a list. Use when:
  • Checking off completed items
  • Selecting applicable categories
  • Multiple issues to flag
  • Feature selection
Note: When using Multi Selection, the “Value to Review” must be a list (array) of options.

Value to Review (Required)

The content the reviewer will see and evaluate. Reference output from previous workflow steps. Examples: Review AI-generated content (Text format):
{{step_5.output}}
Review formatted data (Text format):
{{step_8.output}}
Review multiple fields (Text format):
Title: {{step_3.output.title}}
Content: {{step_3.output.content}}
Keywords: {{step_3.output.keywords}}
Single Selection - List of options:
["Approve", "Needs Revision", "Reject"]
Multi Selection - List of options:
["Factual Accuracy", "Grammar and Spelling", "Brand Voice", "SEO Optimization", "Call to Action"]
Single Selection - From previous step:
{{step_3.output.options}}
Tips:
  • For Text format: Reference the specific content that needs review
  • For Single/Multi Selection: Provide a list (array) of options
  • Format for readability
  • Include relevant context
  • Can combine multiple step outputs

Adding Multiple Review Items

Click Add Content For Review to add additional review items to the same block. Use cases:
  • Review multiple content pieces simultaneously
  • Separate approval for different aspects
  • Collect different types of feedback
  • Multi-step approval process
Example configuration:
Review Content 1: Blog post content (Text format)
Review Content 2: SEO metadata (Single Selection: Approve/Revise)
Review Content 3: Images (Multi Selection: Select approved images)
Each review item gets a separate output field accessible via:
{{step_X.output.review_content_1}}
{{step_X.output.review_content_2}}
{{step_X.output.review_content_3}}

Error Handling

Define what happens if the review process encounters an error. Options:
  1. Terminate Workflow: Stop execution immediately if error occurs
  2. Continue Execution: Proceed to next step despite error
Recommendation: Use Terminate Workflow to ensure critical approvals are not skipped.

Output Data

The Human Review block returns an object containing responses for each review item.

Output Structure

{
  "review_content_1": "Approved. Content looks great and follows brand guidelines.",
  "review_content_2": "Approve",
  "review_content_3": ["Image 1", "Image 3", "Image 5"]
}

Accessing Review Responses

Single review item:
{{step_10.output.review_content_1}}
Multiple review items:
First review: {{step_10.output.review_content_1}}
Second review: {{step_10.output.review_content_2}}
Third review: {{step_10.output.review_content_3}}

How Do I Use Review Responses?

The review responses can be used in subsequent workflow steps.

Example: Incorporating Feedback

Human Review output:
{
  "review_content_1": "Please emphasize the benefits more and add statistics to support claims."
}
LLM block using feedback:
Original content:
{{step_3.output}}

Editor feedback:
{{step_5.output.review_content_1}}

Please revise the content based on the editor's feedback above.
Use cases:
  • Pass review feedback to LLM blocks for content revision
  • Include review responses in final output text
  • Reference approval status in Google Sheets for record keeping
  • Display review comments in subsequent workflow steps

Best Practices

Review Configuration

  • Clear instructions: Explain exactly what to review and what response is needed
  • Provide context: Include enough information for informed decisions
  • Set expectations: Indicate urgency and what happens after review
  • Format wisely: Use Single/Multi Selection for standardized decisions

Workflow Design

  • Place strategically: Put review blocks at critical decision points
  • Minimize reviews: Don’t overuse - too many reviews slow workflows
  • Group related reviews: Multiple items in one block instead of multiple blocks
  • Plan for delays: Remember workflows will pause until review completes

Response Handling

  • Store decisions: Save review responses to sheets for audit trail
  • Use feedback effectively: Pass review comments to subsequent LLM blocks for revisions
  • Document responses: Include review data in final output for record keeping

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Content Review and Revision

1. LLM Block → Generate blog post
2. Human Review → Review content (Text format for feedback)
3. LLM Block → Revise based on feedback from step 2
4. Google Sheets → Save final content

Pattern 2: Multi-Stage Approval

1. LLM Block → Generate content
2. Human Review → Editor review (Text feedback)
3. LLM Block → Incorporate editor feedback
4. Human Review → Final approval (Single Selection: Publish/Needs More Work)
5. Google Sheets → Save content with approval status

Pattern 3: Batch Content Review

1. Loop Block → Generate multiple content pieces
2. Text Block → Format all outputs
3. Human Review → Review all content (Text format for notes)
4. Google Sheets → Export with review notes

Workflow Behavior During Review

What Happens When Review Starts

  1. Workflow execution pauses at the Human Review block
  2. Reviewer receives notification (if configured)
  3. Workflow status shows “Awaiting Human Review”
  4. Other workflow steps do not execute until review completes

What Reviewers See

  • The title you configured
  • Instructions (if provided)
  • The value to review (formatted content)
  • Input field based on format selected
  • Submit button to complete review

After Review Submission

  1. Reviewer’s response is captured
  2. Workflow automatically resumes
  3. Output becomes available to subsequent steps
  4. Workflow continues to completion

Tips for Effective Reviews

For Review Configuration:
  • Include examples of good/bad responses in instructions
  • Use selections when possible for faster reviews
  • Limit text reviews to cases needing detailed feedback
  • Show only relevant context - not everything
For Reviewers:
  • Keep responses consistent with format expectations
  • Provide actionable feedback in text responses
  • Use selection options as defined
  • Complete reviews promptly to avoid workflow delays
For Workflow Design:
  • Use review feedback in subsequent LLM blocks for improvements
  • Plan for workflow delays during review periods

What’s Next

Now that you understand the Human Review block: